Integrated Pharmacophore-Guided Atom-Based 3D-QSAR, Molecular Docking, Virtual Screening, and ADMET Analysis for the Identification of Novel 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-Based Aldose Reductase Inhibitors

Abstract

Background: Chronic diabetic complications develop through the important role of aldose reductase (AR), a key enzyme in the polyol pathway. Clearly, it is important to identify potent AR inhibitors with better PK properties for treatment of diabetes-associated complications.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to discover novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives as aldose reductase inhibitors using an integrated computational drug discovery approach.

Methods: The dataset consisted of 30 reported 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives, which were analysed by the pharmacophore modelling, atom-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR), molecular docking, structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis, R-group enumeration, virtual screening and ADMET prediction methods. Using the best pharmacophore model (AHHRR_1), a validated 3D-QSAR model was developed, and 1,419 new derivatives were designed. These compounds were then further optimised for binding interactions and pharmacokinetic parameters with the top-ranked ones, including the designed derivative PD01.

Results: The optimised pharmacophore and 3D-QSAR models were able to recognise the crucial structural elements that are essential for AR inhibition. Activity increased with the hydrophobic and electron-withdrawing groups, while the bulky polar groups were responsible for decreased activity. Docking studies showed that compounds 04 (-10.178 kcal/mol), 01 (-10.081 kcal/mol), 02 (-10.050 kcal/mol), 10 (-9.977 kcal/mol), and 11 (-9.672 kcal/mol) exhibited stronger binding than Epalrestat (-8.182 kcal/mol). The highest docking score was obtained for PD01 (-10.605 kcal/mol), which had strong hydrogen-bond, hydrophobic, π-π stacking, π-cation and halogen-bond interactions. The ADMET analysis showed good drug-likeness and good oral absorption.

Conclusion: The integrated computational workflow has concluded that PD01 is the most promising lead candidate with excellent binding affinity, a favourable interaction pattern and desirable ADMET properties. The results suggest that the scaffold 1,3,4-thiadiazole is a promising structural template for designing new generation aldose reductase inhibitors for diabetic complications.

  • Page Number : 108-132
  • Published Date : 2026-08-13
  • Keywords
    Aldose reductase inhibitors, 1,3,4-thiadiazole, Pharmacophore modelling, 3D-QSAR, Molecular docking
  • DOI Number
    10.15415/jptrm.2025.132007
  • Authors
    Priya Devi, Debarshi Mondal, Shalini Sharma, and Harmel Singh Chahal

References

  • Acar Çevik, U., Celik, I., Işık, A., Ahmad, I., Patel, H., Özkay, Y., & Kaplancıklı, Z. A. (2023). Design, synthesis, molecular modeling, DFT, ADME and biological evaluation studies of some new 1,3,4-oxadiazole linked benzimidazoles as anticancer agents and aromatase inhibitors. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 41(5), 1944–1958. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2022.2025906
  • Ahmed, S. S., & Rahman, M. O. (2024). From flora to pharmaceuticals: 100 new additions to angiosperms of Gafargaon subdistrict in Bangladesh and unraveling antidiabetic drug candidates targeting DPP4 through in silico approach. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0301348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301348
  • Akdağ, M., Çam, M. G., Ergen, D., Demir, Y., Beydemir, Ş., & Özçelik, A. B. (2025). Synthesis of new pyridazinone derivatives and their dual inhibitory activity on aldose reductase and α-glucosidase. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 130498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2025.130498
  • Asati, V., Bharti, S. K., & Budhwani, A. K. (2017). 3D-QSAR and virtual screening studies of thiazolidine-2,4-dione analogs: Validation of experimental inhibitory potencies towards PIM-1 kinase. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1133, 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.12.006
  • Balestri, F., Moschini, R., Mura, U., Cappiello, M., & Del Corso, A. (2022). In search of differential inhibitors of aldose reductase. Biomolecules, 12(4), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12040485
  • Bisht, P., Gautam, P., Bhattacharya, A., Singh, R., & Verma, S. K. (2025). Designing of xanthine-based DPP-4 inhibitors: A structure-guided alignment dependent multifacet 3D-QSAR modeling, and molecular dynamics simulation study. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 43(13), 6971–6995. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2024.2329787
  • Brownlee, M. (2001). Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature, 414(6865), 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/414813a
  • Chung, S. S. M., & Chung, S. K. (2005). Aldose reductase in diabetic microvascular complications. Current Drug Targets, 6(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450054021891
  • Gholami Rostami, E., & Fatemi, M. H. (2018). Comparative molecular field analysis and hologram quantitative structure activity relationship studies of pyrimidine series as potent phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 65(11), 1293–1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201700435
  • Gholami Rostami, E., & Fatemi, M. H. (2019). Molecular docking and receptor-based QASR studies on pyrimidine derivatives as potential phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors. Structural Chemistry, 30(6), 2347–2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01353-6
  • Gupta, S., Saha, M., Singh, R., Ahmed, S. B., & Asati, V. (2025). Multistage in silico approach to identify novel quinoline derivatives as potential c-kit kinase inhibitors. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 43(11), 5313–5330. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2024.2308759
  • Haritha, M., Sreerag, M., & Suresh, C. H. (2024). Quantifying the hydrogen-bond propensity of drugs and its relationship with Lipinski's rule of five. New Journal of Chemistry, 48(11), 4896–4908. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NJ05476D
  • Hosen, S. Z., Dash, R., Khatun, M., Akter, R., Bhuiyan, M. H. R., Karim, M. R., ... & Afrin, S. (2017). In silico ADME/T and 3D QSAR analysis of KDR inhibitors. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 7(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2017.70116
  • Inamdar, A., Pote, S., Sawant, S., Salve, P. S., Suryawanshi, S. S., & Palled, M. (2023). Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties' screening of selected cardiovascular agents: An in silico approach. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2653667/v1
  • Kaya, B., Acar Çevik, U., Çiftçi, B., Duran, H. E., Türkeş, C., Işık, M., ... & Beydemir, S. (2024). Synthesis, α-glucosidase, α-amylase, and aldose reductase inhibitory activity with molecular docking study of novel imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives. ACS Omega, 9(42), 42905–42914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c05619
  • Kaya, B., Acar Çevik, U., Necip, A., Duran, H. E., Çiftçi, B., Işık, M., ... & Beydemir, S. (2025). Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives targeting both aldose reductase and aldose reductase for diabetes mellitus. ACS Omega, 10(18), 18812–18828. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00566
  • Oates, P. J. (2008). Aldose reductase, still a compelling target for diabetic neuropathy. Current Drug Targets, 9(1), 14–36.
  • Oates, P. J., & Mylari, B. L. (1999). Aldose reductase inhibitors: Therapeutic implications for diabetic complications. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 8(12), 2095–2119. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.8.12.2095
  • Polya, G., & Read, R. C. (2012). Combinatorial enumeration of groups, graphs, and chemical compounds. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4664-0
  • Ramunno, A., Cosconati, S., Sartini, S., Maglio, V., Angiuoli, S., La Pietra, V., ... & Novellino, E. (2012). Progresses in the pursuit of aldose reductase inhibitors: The structure-based lead optimization step. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 51, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.02.045
  • Sharma, R., Roy, S., & Kumar, A. (2025). Drug repurposing and virtual screening. In K. Jain & A. K. Yadav (Eds.), Advances in pharmaceutical product development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9230-6_16
  • Shulgau, Z., Palamarchuk, I. V., Sergazy, S., Urazbayeva, A., Ramankulov, Y., & Kulakov, I. V. (2024). Synthesis, computational study, and in vitro aldose reductase inhibitory action of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives of 3-aminopyridin-2(1H)-ones. Pharmaceuticals, 17(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030377
  • Singh Grewal, A., Bhardwaj, S., Pandita, D., Lather, V., & Singh Sekhon, B. (2016). Updates on aldose reductase inhibitors for management of diabetic complications and non-diabetic diseases. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 16(2), 120–162. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557515666150909143737
  • Singh, Y., Jaswal, S., Singh, S., Verma, S. K., & Thareja, S. (2022). Dual aromatase-steroid sulfatase inhibitors (DASI's) for the treatment of breast cancer: A structure guided ligand based designing approach. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 41(20), 10604–10626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2022.2155702
  • Srivastava, S. K., Ramana, K. V., & Bhatnagar, A. (2005). Role of aldose reductase and oxidative damage in diabetes and the consequent potential for therapeutic options. Endocrine Reviews, 26(3), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2004-0028
  • Stitou, M., Toufik, H., Bouachrine, M., & Lamchouri, F. (2021). Quantitative structure–activity relationships analysis, homology modeling, docking and molecular dynamics studies of triterpenoid saponins as Kirsten rat sarcoma inhibitors. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 39(1), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1707122
  • Vanajothi, R., Hemamalini, V., Jeyakanthan, J., & Premkumar, K. (2020). Ligand-based pharmacophore mapping and virtual screening for identification of potential discoidin domain receptor 1 inhibitors. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 38(9), 2800–2808. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1640132
  • Veerasamy, R., Rajak, H., Jain, A., Sivadasan, S., Varghese, C. P., & Agrawal, R. K. (2011). Validation of QSAR models-strategies and importance. International Journal of Drug Design and Discovery, 3, 511–519. https://doi.org/10.37285/ijddd.2.3.1
  • Verma, S. K., Kumar, N., & Thareja, S. (2021). Gaussian field-based comparative 3D QSAR modelling for the identification of favourable pharmacophoric features of chromene derivatives as selective inhibitors of ALR2 over ALR1. Structural Chemistry, 32(3), 1289–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01714-6
  • Vishwakarma, K., & Bhatt, H. (2021). Molecular modelling of quinoline derivatives as telomerase inhibitors through 3D-QSAR, molecular dynamics simulation, and molecular docking techniques. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 27(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-020-04648-2
  • Yadav, R., Imran, M., Dhamija, P., Chaurasia, D. K., & Handu, S. (2021). Virtual screening, ADMET prediction and dynamics simulation of potential compounds targeting the main protease of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 39(17), 6617–6632. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1796812